Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinboner spirit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was -- Cirt (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinboner Spirit. -- Cirt (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Shinboner spirit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nearly three years ago, someone proposed merging this into North Melbourne Football Club. I have to agree, and would like to add that this article has nothing of value that isn't already in the North Melobourne Football Club article. I'm taking it further and proposing this article for deletion - the football club article covers this topic in plenty of detail and without the disorganized fan bragging of this one. Dondegroovily (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It seems that there is another afd discussion for this same article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinboner Spirit (with a capital S on spirit, while this has a lowercase s). A user made a comment on that discussion, which didn't appear on this one. Perhaps an administrator could merge these to fix this or something? Dondegroovily (talk) 05:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.